{"id":42682,"date":"2017-02-20T07:30:15","date_gmt":"2017-02-20T11:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rire.ctreq.qc.ca\/critique-hattie\/"},"modified":"2017-02-20T07:30:15","modified_gmt":"2017-02-20T11:30:15","slug":"critique-hattie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rire.ctreq.qc.ca\/critique-hattie\/","title":{"rendered":"Un portrait critique des travaux de John Hattie"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Les travaux de John Hattie sont souvent cit\u00e9s comme \u00e9tant le \u00ab Saint Graal \u00bb de l\u2019\u00e9ducation. Devant ce constat, certains chercheurs ont cru bon d\u2019apporter quelques nuances au discours entourant l\u2019engouement pour ces donn\u00e9es dites \u00ab probantes \u00bb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":31639,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n